<div dir="ltr"><div style>On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Otavio Salvador <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:otavio@ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">otavio@ossystems.com.br</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div class="h5">On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 3 April 2013 01:34, Rogerio Nunes <<a href="mailto:ronunes@gmail.com">ronunes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> librsvg depends on gtk+, which in turn does not support framebuffer<br>
>> as backend in current version (2.15.24). This patch disables librsvg<br>
>> when x11 is not in the distro.<br>
><br>
> One of my plans is to make every optional dependency a packageconfig<br>
> option in the long term, so feel free to do the rest whilst you're<br>
> there! :)<br>
<br>
</div></div>I agree with the longterm goal but let's not hold this until the goal<br>
is accomplished. This fixes a real issue and delay it won't help.</blockquote><div><br></div>I agree with both. This is a real issue and I like the long term plan.<div style>Hope I can help to execute it :)</div></div>
</div></div>