<div dir="ltr">On 29 May 2013 13:14, Burton, Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 26 May 2013 15:03, Marko Lindqvist <<a href="mailto:cazfi74@gmail.com">cazfi74@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Last gtk2-compatible version of vte is 0.28.2 currently present on OE core.<br>
> Later versions depend on gtk3.<br>
<br>
</div>vte supports both gtk2 and gtk3.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div> 0.30.0 NEWS states that "dropped support for gtk2". While this sounds like upstream 0.28.2 would work with either gtk2 or gtk3, OE recipe depends on "gtk+", which is always gtk2?<br>
</div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
> Since gtk3 exist in OE core, it would make<br>
> sense to be able to build version of vte (and other similar packages)<br>
> that does not depend on gtk2. Otherwise we end with systems that must<br>
> contain both gtk2 (to be used by some programs) and gtk3 (to be used by<br>
> other programs).<br>
> This patch just adds new recipe for latest vte version, 0.34.5, alongside<br>
> with 0.28.2 version.<br>
> How should priorities be set? "1" for gtk2-version, so it gets selected despite gtk3-version being newer?<br>
<br>
</div>Because they are *not* drop-in replacements, how about naming the gtk3<br>
vte <a href="http://vte3_3.34.5.bb" target="_blank">vte3_3.34.5.bb</a>?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div> I think calling it vte3 would be confusing at best, when vte itself is not version 3.x. How about "vte-gtk3"?<br>
</div><div> <br><br></div><div><font color="#888888"> - ML<br><br></font></div></div></div></div>