<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Nicolas Dechesne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org" target="_blank">nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Saul Wold <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 06/05/2013 10:12 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Saul Wold <<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a><br></div><div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
On 06/05/2013 09:32 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Saul Wold <<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a>><br></div><div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
You could just directly put the nativesdk-libx11 in place<br>
of the<br>
variable, no need to have the variable there.<br>
<br>
<br>
yes, that's what I had initially, but found it was less easy to<br>
read...<br>
with X11DEPENDS it's more 'obvious' that there is something<br>
special..<br>
that said, i can make the change if that's really needed.<br>
<br>
We do use the X11DEPENDS elsewhere when there are multiple<br>
dependencies, but I also found cases where we just include the<br>
dependency directly in the test. I was trying pick a direction:<br>
single entry no X11DEPENDS, multiple entries use X11DEPENDS.<br>
<br>
Comments, flames, ...<br>
<br>
<br>
Yes; I sent this patch in Febuary:<br>
<a href="http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/44759/" target="_blank">http://patchwork.openembedded.<u></u>org/patch/44759/</a><br>
<br>
Please use this one instead of the recent one.<br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
Well reading back on that, it looks like I was waiting for an EXTRA_OECONF or related change to the autoconf scripts.<br>
<br>
Sau!</blockquote><div><br></div></div></div><div>hmm. ok, sorry Otavio, i missed the other patch. I will check on my side too about EXTRA_OECONF.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Nicolas, don't worry. It is normal to end redoing some stuff.</div>
<div><br></div><div style>Last time I checked it had no support in Qt build system; I am not sure if it uses or not the host headers (in case they exist) but it needs testing to be sure.</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems<br>
<a href="http://www.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://www.ossystems.com.br</a> <a href="http://projetos.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://projetos.ossystems.com.br</a><br>Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750<br>
</div></div>