<div dir="ltr">Why it does not make sense in my opinion is the fact that the many people would already need to do this right now. Yet, you prefer a few people (if any?) with only a very limited application set out of the 1000+, as it is only two which is affected?<div>
<br></div><div>I do not understand how the gun can be compared to the cannon. It is unfortunate you guys introduced regressions for those users, but I just do not have time to make everyone happy. I am not paid for this as a few in here. However, I still think making more users happy than less is a nice thing.</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Burton, Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 29 July 2013 11:42, Laszlo Papp <<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org">lpapp@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> you would cause a "runtime" issue which is pretty simple to fix<br>
<br>
</div>Enabling rfkill would involve writing a bbappend and patching busybox,<br>
when a PACKAGECONFIG would make everyone happy and configurable from<br>
the distro. Even if we disagree on what the default value should be,<br>
it should be a PACKAGECONFIG.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Ross<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>