<div dir="ltr">OK, I give up the contribution. I really cannot collaborate with people who think it is acceptable to break *many* users' life for the whole project without being able to use anything in favor of a very limited (!) people with only two (!) applications.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Burton, Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 29 July 2013 11:20, Phil Blundell <<a href="mailto:pb@pbcl.net">pb@pbcl.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> But in this particular case, your new patch seems to have more serious<br>
> problems since it will cause rfkill to silently disappear for many<br>
> people who do currently have it.<br>
><br>
> If your distro selects a toolchain which doesn't contain the necessary<br>
> bits to support rfkill then it seems as though the appropriate course of<br>
> action would be to either:<br>
<br>
</div>I'm in agreement with Phil. Whilst support for userspaces that from<br>
2009 is patchy at best with modern software (you'll need an equally<br>
old udev, systemd won't happen, etc) this is a trivial change but<br>
let's be clear that it's an option to handle older external userspaces<br>
and not our so there should be a PACKAGECONFIG for rfkill that<br>
defaults to enabled.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Ross<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>