<div dir="ltr">Oh, it is actually also in danny. I was looking into the "files" directory, but it is in the other.<div><br></div><div>It is definitely not in denzil though.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laszlo Papp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Only _one_, not two.</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Phil Blundell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pb@pbcl.net" target="_blank">pb@pbcl.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:22 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:<br>
> I disagree. This change should not have gone in the first place<br>
> causing the regression for the users. Please be consistent with the<br>
> history.<br>
<br>
</div>If this was a recent change then I would have some (limited) amount of<br>
sympathy for your position. But the commit you are complaining about<br>
has been in the tree for over a year, and it was presumably included in<br>
at least one if not two of the most recent stable releases.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
p.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>