<div dir="ltr">Exactly, so you broke the update for the last two new versions on the *build* level.<div><br></div><div>Anyway, if you do not have any sympathy for older users, then I am very disappointed.</div><div><br></div>
<div>After this change, the image will build just fine for the "new" people. Also, if you do not write a change on top of mine, it is probably not so important anyhow?</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Phil Blundell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pb@pbcl.net" target="_blank">pb@pbcl.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:22 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:<br>
> I disagree. This change should not have gone in the first place<br>
> causing the regression for the users. Please be consistent with the<br>
> history.<br>
<br>
</div>If this was a recent change then I would have some (limited) amount of<br>
sympathy for your position. But the commit you are complaining about<br>
has been in the tree for over a year, and it was presumably included in<br>
at least one if not two of the most recent stable releases.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
p.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>