<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">One person not using the latest toolchains?</span><br><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">At any rate, can someone provide a helper change from the past for PACKAGEGROUP like changes?</span></div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rep.dot.nop@gmail.com" target="_blank">rep.dot.nop@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 29 July 2013 15:34:29 Laszlo Papp <<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
No, it should be disabled by default based on the fact most people do not<br>
need this "rfkill" what even upstream has been disabling, and it would be<br>
only enabled for those two utils out of the several thousand out there,<br>
anyhow.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
It was disabled just because of one guy known to notoriously use outdated toolchains on recent packages. But OK, I'm out of this whole discussion.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I am just repeating myself as the same is questioned again, again, and<br>
again.<br>
<br>
... or you really think that "rfkill" is needed for the majority use cases<br>
out there?<br>
<br>
<br>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <<br>
<a href="mailto:rep.dot.nop@gmail.com" target="_blank">rep.dot.nop@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On 29 July 2013 14:20:05 Laszlo Papp <<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Oh, it is actually also in danny. I was looking into the "files"<br>
>> directory,<br>
>> but it is in the other.<br>
>><br>
>> It is definitely not in denzil though.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Perhaps disable it only in the layer that pulls in these pre-2.6.31 kernel<br>
> headers?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laszlo Papp <<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> > Only _one_, not two.<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Phil Blundell <<a href="mailto:pb@pbcl.net" target="_blank">pb@pbcl.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:22 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:<br>
>> >> > I disagree. This change should not have gone in the first place<br>
>> >> > causing the regression for the users. Please be consistent with the<br>
>> >> > history.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> If this was a recent change then I would have some (limited) amount of<br>
>> >> sympathy for your position. But the commit you are complaining about<br>
>> >> has been in the tree for over a year, and it was presumably included in<br>
>> >> at least one if not two of the most recent stable releases.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> p.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> Sent with AquaMail for Android<br>
> <a href="http://www.aqua-mail.com" target="_blank">http://www.aqua-mail.com</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Sent with AquaMail for Android<br>
<a href="http://www.aqua-mail.com" target="_blank">http://www.aqua-mail.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>