<div dir="ltr">On 21 August 2013 11:16, Laszlo Papp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Having had an inconvenient debugging session this morning with the help of you, ndec, and so forth on IRC, I would propose to get rid of this gtk doc stub, at least how it is now. It is completely breaking projects causing regressions compared to denzil. We are pretty much blocked by it altogether now. Here is the other thread for details: <a href="https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2013-August/009184.html" target="_blank">https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2013-August/009184.html</a><div>
<br></div><div>IMHO, there should be a way for end users to get rid of the blocker issue and regression. So, how about making this optional?</div></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>We used to patch each recipe individually and it wasn't pleasant. gtk-doc-stub is just the first place you're hitting problems with putting DL_DIR inside a git repository, removing it will cause something else to break.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Ross</div></div></div></div>