<div dir="ltr">I am not saying to fix gtk-doc-stub only. I am saying fix the nastiness of using git repositories for released and supposedly stable versions. I do not see why tarball would not be enough for those to work off-hand? That should be the ideal architecture IMHO.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Burton, Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="im">On 21 August 2013 11:16, Laszlo Papp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Having had an inconvenient debugging session this morning with the help of you, ndec, and so forth on IRC, I would propose to get rid of this gtk doc stub, at least how it is now. It is completely breaking projects causing regressions compared to denzil. We are pretty much blocked by it altogether now. Here is the other thread for details: <a href="https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2013-August/009184.html" target="_blank">https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2013-August/009184.html</a><div>
<br></div><div>IMHO, there should be a way for end users to get rid of the blocker issue and regression. So, how about making this optional?</div></div></blockquote><div> </div></div><div>We used to patch each recipe individually and it wasn't pleasant. gtk-doc-stub is just the first place you're hitting problems with putting DL_DIR inside a git repository, removing it will cause something else to break.</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div><div>Ross</div></font></span></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>