<div dir="ltr">Hello,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Paul Eggleton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Wednesday 04 December 2013 20:46:50 Andrei Gherzan wrote:<br>
> This version includes libavresample needed for packages like xbmc.<br>
> To use this version add:<br>
> PREFERRED_VERSION_libav = "9.10".<br>
<br>
</div>We really want to avoid having too many versions of the same recipe hanging<br>
around. However, it seems premature to drop 0.8.x at this point. Perhaps we<br>
should drop the libav_git recipe that we currently have, since that is just<br>
pointing at an old 0.9.x version?<br>
<br>
Anyone have any thoughts on this?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes. I think this is a good thing. The idea is that they maintain two types of releases: 0.X and 9.X so probably there are some incompatibilities between these two. </div>
<div><br></div><div>ag</div></div>
</div></div>