<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Mark Hatle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com" target="_blank">mark.hatle@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 12/13/13, 8:56 AM, Christopher Larson wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
From: Christopher Larson <<a href="mailto:chris_larson@mentor.com" target="_blank">chris_larson@mentor.com</a>><br>
<br>
This is needed by systemd, among other useful applications. All fields are<br>
metadata driven, and initial values come from our DISTRO variables.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I thought there was a part of the lsb-release recipe that did this same thing.<br>
<br>
It doesn't set the 'os-release' file, but the 'lsb-release' file. Maybe it would make sense to consolidate this stuff into a base-file-...</blockquote></div><br>Yeah, that’s part of why I posted this as an RFC, there’s this question of whether such things should just get folded into base-files, or stay separate. I don’t have a very strong opinion on it either way, myself.<br>
-- <br>Christopher Larson<br>clarson at kergoth dot com<br>Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus<br>Maintainer - Tslib<br>Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
</div></div>