<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Robert Yang <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:liezhi.yang@windriver.com" target="_blank">liezhi.yang@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":51b" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">If we run "bitbake -S <span class="il">base</span>-<span class="il">files</span>" today, and re-run it tomorrow with<br>
nothing changed, we would see that the do_install.sigdata changes<br>
because of:<br>
<br>
do_intall -> do_install_basefilesissue -> DISTRO_VERSION -> DATE<br>
<br>
We had set:<br>
IMAGE_NAME[vardepsexclude] += "DATETIME"<br>
in meta/conf/bitbake.conf, we can set a similar line in<br>
<a href="http://base-files_3.0.14.bb" target="_blank"><span class="il">base</span>-files_3.0.14.bb</a> to fix the problem.<br>
<br>
[YOCTO #6032]<br>
<br>
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <<a href="mailto:liezhi.yang@windriver.com">liezhi.yang@windriver.com</a>></div></blockquote></div><br>Wont't this mean base-files wouldn't be rebuilt when the day changes? This seems problematic to me. I think this is a legitimate case for a checksum change. If the distro version changes due to the date changing, and the base-files includes the distro version in the issue file, then we'd *want* base-files to rebuild to ensure the issue file is correct, otherwise it'd be inaccurate, no?<br>
-- <br>Christopher Larson<br>clarson at kergoth dot com<br>Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus<br>Maintainer - Tslib<br>Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
</div></div>