<div dir="ltr">Any reason why this feature has never got in? It was submitted more than five months ago, and it would have added some feature to the system even if not _everything_ right from the beginning?</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Laszlo Papp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="">On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Martin Jansa <<a href="mailto:martin.jansa@gmail.com">martin.jansa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 01:59:15PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote:<br>
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > On 20 March 2014 19:01, Laszlo Papp <<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org">lpapp@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> This init script is adding support for sysv and no more. This is also<br>
>> >> indicated in the first line of the commit message. I am sorry, but I<br>
>> >> will not test it systemd and with other systems<br>
>> ><br>
>> > You're not being asked to test with systemd. You're being asked to<br>
>> > add LSB-standard sysvinit-specific headers to a sysvinit script.<br>
>><br>
>> In my understanding, people were referring to two issues:<br>
>><br>
>> 1) not working with systemd and what not compat modes. This is not<br>
>> something I will test any soon.<br>
><br>
> Other people already know it's causing the issues without LSB headers,<br>
> so if you just add them, you don't need to test it with systemd, other<br>
> people who care about systemd will do that for you or at least be OK<br>
> with adding this script, because it will have LSB headers (so it should<br>
> work fine in systemd world).<br>
<br>
</div>If someone is really interested in systemd, et al, unlike me at this<br>
point, I guess it is not a big deal to get an LSB header from someone<br>
to get it integrated into my change?<br>
<br>
If no one cares about that, then why bother? So, if someone sends this<br>
to me I will integrate it, otherwise there is no point since that<br>
means no one cares.<br>
<br>
But then again, this should not still block the change as it can be<br>
added incrementally. I am not sure if it is a good idea to block a<br>
feature because it does not provide another feature, too.<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>