<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 January 2015 at 15:42, Saul Wold <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">sgw@linux.intel.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":6bu" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/gnu-efi/<a href="http://gnu-efi_3.0u.bb" target="_blank">gnu-efi_3.0u.bb</a><br>
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/gnu-efi/<a href="http://gnu-efi_3.0w.bb" target="_blank">gnu-efi_3.0w.bb</a><br>
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ SRC_URI = &quot;<a href="http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gnu-efi/gnu-efi_3.0u.orig.tar.gz" target="_blank">http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gnu-efi/gnu-efi_3.0u.orig.tar.gz</a> \<br>
            file://parallel-make.patch \<br>
            file://parallel-make-archives.patch \<br>
           &quot;<br>
+<br>
 SRC_URI[md5sum] = &quot;d15d3c700e79a1e2938544d73edc572d&quot;<br>
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = &quot;3c0d450d5829204ca05dcb3b2aae772e52c379b7c7e09146759c6315606f934e&quot;</div></blockquote></div><br>No change to the checksums, presumably they didn&#39;t brute-force a sha256sum attack to do that. ;)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>