<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">On 10 June 2015 at 10:17, Paul Eggleton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":8u" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">I have to be honest and say I don't like meta-oe continuing to be a dumping<br>
ground for old things that only a few (or no) people are using - if we must<br>
keep these recipes around, I'd rather they go into a different layer even if<br>
that layer's only grouping factor is "legacy items", at least then they are<br>
labelled appropriately. GStreamer 0.10 and BlueZ 4 were recent examples,<br>
perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, although I don't necessarily think<br>
it's too late.<br>
<br>
Martin - what do you think?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>A meta-legacy layer does have a certain appeal as it would clearly indicate that these recipes are unmaintained. That won't really apply for neon though - libmusicbrainz in meta-multimedia is still useful/in active development and depends on neon.</div><div><br></div><div>Ross</div></div></div></div>