<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 12 June 2015 at 09:40, Paul Eggleton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":2xq" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">I didn't talk to Richard about it but I think there may have been some<br>
discussion on this list about the possibility of 9->10->11 breaking API<br>
compatibility with applications. Did you do testing with recipes in meta-<br>
oe/meta-multimedia that depend upon libav?</div></blockquote></div><br>Yes, that's exactly why I didn't merge it into MUT: more research needed as this upgrade was proposed by Kai a few weeks back and there was a discussion there.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I wasn't rejecting the upgrade, just needed a good look and didn't get around to it yet. The big question is upgrade path: does everything in oe-core still build, and is there a sufficient amount of recipes outside of oe-core using libav 9 that we should keep it around?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>