<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 July 2015 at 12:17, Amarnath Valluri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:amarnath.valluri@intel.com" target="_blank">amarnath.valluri@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":1ma" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">- Build system changed from autotools to cmake.<br>
- Perl dependency added.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We had almost exactly this patch a week or so ago from Cristian (CC'd) who promptly retracted it with the comment that he "hadn't done enough testing".</div><div><br></div><div>Cristian, was there something wrong with the 1.0.1 upgrade, or were you being cautious and the patch is fine?</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":1ma" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden"> SRC_URI = "<a href="https://github.com/${BPN}/${BPN}/archive/v${PV}.tar.gz" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/${BPN}/${BPN}/archive/v${PV}.tar.gz</a>"</div></blockquote></div><br>Until the people at github confirm that tarballs generated with archive/ are static I don't trust them. Luckily the libical maintainers actually released a tarball of 1.0.1 so the recipe should use that.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>