<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>The intention of using os.getuid() is to avoid writing hardcoded value "0", since os.getuid() return "0" under fakeroot env; if root user is having UID as 0.That's the advantage I can think of.</div><div></div></blockquote></div><br></span>root is *always* UID 0, and packaging always runs as root. </div></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"> Can you send a tested v2 with explicit 0 instead of assuming that you're running under pseudo?</div></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>Patch v2 has been sent.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Jagadeesh</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div class="gmail_extra"></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>