<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Dan McGregor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danismostlikely@gmail.com" target="_blank">danismostlikely@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><p dir="ltr">On 12 Nov 2015 5:41 p.m., "Christopher Larson" <<a href="mailto:kergoth@gmail.com" target="_blank">kergoth@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> From: Christopher Larson <<a href="mailto:chris_larson@mentor.com" target="_blank">chris_larson@mentor.com</a>><br>
><br>
> We don't need nss-myhostname on systemd systems, because systemd already<br>
> provides myhostname, but we weren't configuring nsswitch to use it. Being able<br>
> to resolve the hostname is useful for a number of different applications, so<br>
> enable it using the same postinst/prerm bits which are in nss-myhostname.</p>
</span><p dir="ltr">I have this and a similar change for resolved in an append at work. Would others be interested in that too?</p></blockquote></div><br>I'm sure there are folks that would find that interesting. I'm sure not everyone uses resolved, but I'm sure we want it to work well for folks taht do want to use it.<br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Christopher Larson<br>kergoth at gmail dot com<br>Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus<br>Maintainer - Tslib<br>Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics</div></div>
</div></div>