<div dir="ltr">I was hit by this regeneration again last month so it's still happening.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Burton, Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 10 December 2015 at 23:16, Andre McCurdy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com" target="_blank">armccurdy@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>> +SRC_URI = "<a href="https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/archive/$%7BPV%7D.zip" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/archive/${PV}.zip</a>"<br>
<br>
</span>GitHub tar file archives sometimes get regenerated and the hashes<br>
change. I'm not sure if the same can happen for zip files, but it's<br>
probably safer to checkout a git release tag rather than trust the zip<br>
file.</blockquote></div><br></span>For what it's worth this was true in the past but I'm now reliably informed that the archive tarballs are generated with literally git archive, which goes to great pains to be reproducible. I would pick the tarball over the zip though.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></font></span></div>
<br>--<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>