<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 19 January 2016 at 11:40, Martin Jansa <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:martin.jansa@gmail.com" target="_blank">martin.jansa@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":c72" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">If 0f26747167cc9d82df849b0aad387bf824f04544 is going to be released as<br>
1.43, then it would be better to use 1.42.99+1.43+git${SRCPV} to make<br>
sure, that hypothetical 1.42.14 will also sort lower than this future<br>
1.43.</div></blockquote></div><br>Agreed - if this hash came from the 1.43 branch and won&#39;t ever be released as 1.42, then 1.42.99 is sensible.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>