<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 17 January 2016 at 11:36, Khem Raj <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":v04" class="" style="overflow:hidden">musl does not support backtrace APIs<br>
include limit.h for PATH_MAX definition<br>
<br>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>></div></blockquote><div> </div></div></div>Since the rebase to btrfs-tools 4.4 this fails to patch:<br><br>NOTE: Applying patch '0001-btrfs-corrupt-blocks-Include-limits.h.patch' (../meta/recipes-devtools/btrfs-tools/btrfs-tools/0001-btrfs-corrupt-blocks-Include-limits.h.patch)<br>ERROR: Command Error: exit status: 1 Output:<br>Applying patch 0001-btrfs-corrupt-blocks-Include-limits.h.patch<br><div>patching file btrfs-corrupt-block.c<br>Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.<br>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file btrfs-corrupt-block.c<br>Patch 0001-btrfs-corrupt-blocks-Include-limits.h.patch can be reverse-applied</div><div><br></div><div>Presumably 4.4 accepted these patches and this can be dropped?</div><div><br></div><div>Ross</div></div>