<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 5 February 2016 at 20:55, Nicolas Dechesne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org" target="_blank">nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">> Agreed - some may not want openssl at all and being able to switch it for<br>
> another alternative would be useful.<br>
<br>
</span>sure. but, then I have some questions..<br>
<br>
1. which one we default to? openssl?<br>
<br>
2. which one we support, from <a href="http://configure.ac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">configure.ac</a>:<br>
<br>
[choose SHA1 implementation])])<br>
case "x$with_sha1" in<br>
x | xlibc | xlibmd | xlibnettle | xlibgcrypt | xlibcrypto | xlibsha1 |<br>
xCommonCrypto | xCryptoAPI)<br>
;;<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>nettle / gcrypt / crypto are all in oe-core. I presume that's BSD's "throw it all in" libc.</div><div><br></div><div>nettle seems nice and low down the stack and modern.</div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
3. is there a good way to handle 'multiple choice' with PACKAGECONFIG?<br>
How can we prevent more than 1 PACKAGECONFIG to be set (nicely)?</blockquote></div><br>With a comment saying "pick one of these", and nothing in the disabled case.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>