<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 26 April 2016 at 01:44, Robert Yang <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:liezhi.yang@windriver.com" target="_blank">liezhi.yang@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":33j" class="a3s aXjCH">Thanks, did you mean the following text ? I can't find MIT license there.<br>
<br>
/*<span class=""><br>
* Copyright © 2001 Red Hat, Inc<br></span>
*<span class=""><br></span></div></blockquote></div><br>Yes, this one. I've just had a chat with Beth and we both agree that it's practically MIT, even if it's not worded traditionally. My personal belief is that this license is Red Hat's legal department's wording of MIT. Pointing it at the MIT license is acceptable, but preferable would be adding a new "RedHat-MIT" license to common-licenses and using that.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>