<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 19 May 2016 at 17:40, Alistair Francis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alistair.francis@xilinx.com" target="_blank">alistair.francis@xilinx.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":f1a" class="a3s aXjCH">On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alistair Francis<br>
<<a href="mailto:alistair.francis@xilinx.com">alistair.francis@xilinx.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <<a href="mailto:alistair.francis@xilinx.com">alistair.francis@xilinx.com</a>><br>
<br>
Ping!<div class="yj6qo ajU"><div id=":f2z" class="ajR" tabindex="0"></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>Sorry meant to reply to this a lot earlier. There's a RFC from Robert Yang which proposes a series of patches to completely rewrite how runqemu works, so the machine-specific knowledge is contained in the BSP itself. As a BSP maintainer who is working on runqemu, would you be able to have a look at see if it should solve all of your needs?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">(this is now marked for my staging branch too)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>