<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 25 May 2016 at 10:41, zhenbo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zhenbo.gao@windriver.com" target="_blank">zhenbo.gao@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":4hm" class="a3s aXjCH m154e74b68516e469">The draft patch looks like:<br>
---<br>
--- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/<a href="http://packagegroup-self-hosted.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">packagegroup-self-hosted.bb</a><br>
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/<a href="http://packagegroup-self-hosted.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">packagegroup-self-hosted.bb</a><br>
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ RDEPENDS_packagegroup-self-hosted = "\<br>
"<br>
<br>
RDEPENDS_packagegroup-self-hosted-host-tools = "\<br>
- connman \<br>
- connman-plugin-ethernet \<br>
dhcp-client \<br>
e2fsprogs \<br>
e2fsprogs-e2fsck \<br>
<br>
What do you think? is that ok? if so, i will send an official patch for it.</div></blockquote></div><br>I don't think self-hosted should include a specific network manager, and you can also remove dhcp-client whilst you're there. The image that pulls in this packagegroup should handle any networking requirements.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>