<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 17 June 2016 at 04:10, Andre McCurdy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com" target="_blank">armccurdy@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 16 June 2016 at 21:49, Mark Asselstine <<a href="mailto:mark.asselstine@windriver.com">mark.asselstine@windriver.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> While waiting to hear back about my inquiry I did take some<br>
>> time to put together this patch that allows things that<br>
>> require the older vte to continue to build. Since xfce4-terminal<br>
>> lives in meta-openembedded this might make more sense to carry<br>
>> over there. I am sure folks will have an opinion so sending this<br>
>> out as an RFC.<br>
><br>
> That's certainly a good argument for putting the old vte in meta-oe.<br>
<br>
</span>The meta-oe layers generally have a higher priority than oe-core, so<br>
having an older version in meta-oe and a newer version in oe-core can<br>
lead to unexpected results.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>As far as I know the versions are parallel installable so that should not be a problem. I removed the old one as there was no need for it in oe-core. Should have checked meta-oe as well, but there were just so many moving parts to juggle here... The right solution should indeed be to add the old one into the layer where it's needed.</div><div><br></div><div>Jussi</div></div></div></div>