<div dir="ltr">meta-xfce4, right?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Burton, Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 16 June 2016 at 21:49, Mark Asselstine <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mark.asselstine@windriver.com" target="_blank">mark.asselstine@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>While waiting to hear back about my inquiry I did take some<br>
time to put together this patch that allows things that<br>
require the older vte to continue to build. Since xfce4-terminal<br>
lives in meta-openembedded this might make more sense to carry<br>
over there. I am sure folks will have an opinion so sending this<br>
out as an RFC.</div></blockquote></div><br></span>That's certainly a good argument for putting the old vte in meta-oe.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></font></span></div>
<br>--<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>