<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 13 July 2016 at 09:49, Khem Raj <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Jussi Kukkonen<br>
<<a href="mailto:jussi.kukkonen@intel.com">jussi.kukkonen@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 16 May 2016 at 18:50, Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> As I said, I would work on 1.10.91 as it is close of 1.11 and easy the<br>
>>> upgrade. But all my patches are based on 1.10 now so it is fine with<br>
>>> me as well so please send the v2.<br>
>><br>
>> If 1.11 is around the corner then why not work on 1.11 ( pre-release ) itself<br>
><br>
> There's not much to work on as far as I can tell: 1.11 should be a<br>
> simple upgrade with trivial patch changes.<br>
> As I said, I'm totally fine with waiting a couple of weeks until 1.11.<br>
> On the other hand I haven't seen any reasons to start packaging a<br>
> pre-release -- why this one if we normally don't do it?<br>
<br>
</span>There has been 1.11 release done for quite a while, are you working on<br>
sending an upgrade for it ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I intend to do that this week, yes. </div><div> </div><div>Jussi</div></div></div></div>