<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 16 July 2016 at 11:41, Robert P. J. Day <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rpjday@crashcourse.ca" target="_blank">rpjday@crashcourse.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":3tl" class="a3s aXjCH m155f34da29b295b1"> as the subject asks, are there any compelling reasons to not use<br>
musl as the C library of choice for OE/YP builds? just wondering about<br>
any potential downsides.<br></div></blockquote></div><br>The musl web site lists the areas where it's missing features or has different behaviour to glibc. Suffice to say it's not a no-brainer and there are some features which are critical to some use cases.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>