<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 August 2016 at 18:11, Mark Hatle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com" target="_blank">mark.hatle@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":2fc" class="a3s aXjCH m1567a96d46492747">Binary locales have an endian and alignment setting to them. If a platform<br>
supports both big and little endian, this common locale would not work. (That<br>
is extremely rare....) Also if a platform supports different alignments in<br>
different libraries that could cause an impact as well. (This is also extremely<br>
unlikely.)<br></div></blockquote></div><br>So by that logic this patch should be rejected, right?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">This path is for the compiled locale definitions - LC_TYPE etc and the locale archive, right? So it's only glibc-locales that ships in here, not other packages (just trying to check my assumptions)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>