<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 18, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" class="">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On 18 August 2016 at 17:41, Khem Raj <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":1w0" class="a3s aXjCH m1569e8858d13a109">Some layers have gstreamer plugin recipes which include<br class="">
the .inc files from OE-Core but they do not get to find<br class="">
the patch that is being forced by the .inc file and<br class="">
ends up with errors like<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class="">Bad commit message as you don't specify the module.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">But should this SRC_URI_append be in the common plugins.inc anyway? Are there out-of-tree modules that don't use gst-common and so the patch won't apply?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>yes there are see</div><div><a href="https://github.com/ndechesne/meta-qcom/blob/master/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-v4l2.bb" class="">https://github.com/ndechesne/meta-qcom/blob/master/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-v4l2.bb</a></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>