<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>The generated parser contains huge hunks of code actually shipped
with bison, so I think we should also expect some semantic
difference.<br>
</p>
Yuanjie<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/11/2016 05:17 PM, Burton, Ross
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJTo0Lb04c39Qz-oTpP-BrLT=ARmr8z9uwEugrc2vK1n6wOp7w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 11 October 2016 at 09:37, Mark
Hatle <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com" target="_blank">mark.hatle@windriver.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":1g3" class="a3s aXjCH m157b2edf9bd2361e">My
understanding of the issue is that the extraction of the
plural.c and<br>
plural.y files happens so quickly that it is unclear to
make if one is older<br>
then the other -- so it sometimes uses bison to rebuild
the plural.c. This<br>
produces a non-deterministic build.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
Surely the rebuilt plural.c should be identical to the shipped
one? (semantically if not literally)</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>