<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Jussi Kukkonen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jussi.kukkonen@intel.com" target="_blank">jussi.kukkonen@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class="">On 13 January 2017 at 15:39, Bruce Ashfield <<a href="mailto:bruce.ashfield@gmail.com" target="_blank">bruce.ashfield@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>><br>><br>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Ross Burton <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>> Hi,<br>>><br>>> Another consolidated pull. Last run on the AB was mostly green:<br>>> - byacc on beaglebone-lsb failed (upgrade removed)<br>>> - checkuri failed (transient, works now)<br>>> - selftest failed (fixed in branch, tests work locally now)<br>><br>><br>><br>> Should I re-send my kernel queue ? It is now about 13 patches long, and I'm stacking<br>> a few more on every couple of days.<br>><br>> I assume there are still some outstanding issues with the 4.9 kernel, or more specifically<br>> the 4.9 kernel headers ?<br>><br>> If there's a pointer to the list of issues, that would be great, so I can help prod things<br>> along (assuming I can sort out the build issues .. c libraries give me headaches ;)<br><br><br></span>There's at least the connman build issue on musl with 4.9 headers:<br><a href="http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/116506/" target="_blank">http://errors.yoctoproject.<wbr>org/Errors/Details/116506/</a><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ah ok.<br><br></div><div>I'm not much good with musl unfortunately, but honestly, I'm wondering how long we<br></div><div>can keep this out with relatively few build issues. In tree, they'll get more attention.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I'll continue stacking on 4.9 changes until they get sorted out. I'll probably have some<br></div><div>cycles near the end of next week to get lost in c library #ifdef's, if the issues are still<br></div><div>around.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Bruce<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br>Musl defines IFF_LOWER_UP which breaks compilation with linux/if.h.<div>kernel has uapi/linux/libc-compat.h for similar issues with glibc but at least currently it does not check for musl...<br><div><br></div><div>See other discussion "musl: Upgrade to 1.1.16+ on master".<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br> - Jussi<br><br><br></font></span></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"</div>
</div></div>