<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 20 March 2017 at 13:29, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:manjukumar.harthikote-matha@xilinx.com" target="_blank">manjukumar.harthikote-matha@xilinx.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
<br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org">openembedded-core-bounces@<wbr>lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org">openembedded-core-<wbr>bounces@lists.openembedded.org</a><wbr>] On Behalf Of<br>
> Robert Yang<br>
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 3:14 PM<br>
> To: Stefano Babic; <a href="mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">openembedded-core@lists.<wbr>openembedded.org</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] file: 5.29 -> 5.30<br>
><br>
> Yes, file's upstream commit ID has changed, Paul has sent a patch for it:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/<wbr>pipermail/openembedded-core/<wbr>2017-</a><br>
> March/134261.html<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>Is it better to use nobranch=1 ?<br>
Changes in this file.git has broken Morty as well, we used nobranch=1 to resolve this issue.<br>
I haven't tested this for other released versions of Yocto.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is band-aid at best: If you do a "cleanall" to force a new clone the commits likely won't be there anymore.</div><div><br></div><div>Jussi</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>