<div dir="ltr">CCing Leo for patchwork issue (is that correct?)<br><br>On 11 April 2017 at 11:32, Patchwork &lt;<a href="mailto:patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org">patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt; == Series Details ==<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Series: gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad: Update packageconfigs and config flags (rev2)<br>&gt; Revision: 2<br><br>Patchwork gets confused here. The comments are valid but they should be for <br>   gstreamer1.0-plugins-good: Backport patch for v4l2object videometa<br>which is not a revision of<br>   gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad: Update packageconfigs and config flags<br><br>Cheers,<div>  Jussi<br> <br>&gt;<br>&gt; URL   : <a href="https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/6284/">https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/6284/</a><br>&gt; State : failure<br>&gt;<br>&gt; == Summary ==<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is<br>&gt; an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed<br>&gt; series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; * Issue             Added patch file is missing Upstream-Status in the header [test_upstream_status_presence]<br>&gt;   Suggested fix    Add Upstream-Status: &lt;status&gt; to the header of meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-good/0001-v4l2object-Also-add-videometa-if-there-is-padding-to.patch (possible values: Pending, Submitted, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate)<br>&gt;<br>&gt; * Issue             A patch file has been added, but does not have a Signed-off-by tag [test_signed_off_by_presence]<br>&gt;   Suggested fix    Sign off the added patch file (meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-plugins-good/0001-v4l2object-Also-add-videometa-if-there-is-padding-to.patch)<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the<br>&gt; mailing list (<a href="mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a>) raising your concerns.<br>&gt; Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new<br>&gt; version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the<br>&gt; version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -&gt; [PATCH v2] -&gt;<br>&gt; [PATCH v3] -&gt; ...).<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ---<br>&gt; Test framework: <a href="http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest">http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest</a><br>&gt; Test suite:     <a href="http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe">http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe</a><br>&gt;<br>&gt; --<br>&gt; _______________________________________________<br>&gt; Openembedded-core mailing list<br>&gt; <a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>&gt; <a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a></div></div>