<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 May 2017 at 23:28, Denys Dmytriyenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:denis@denix.org" target="_blank">denis@denix.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":4on" class="a3s aXjCH m15bf9a1a025ddba4">As of having an alternative for other potential users - there's nothing wrong<br>
with it. But, acceptance criteria into OE-Core is quite high, especially when<br>
there are alternative solutions already available. That's why I'm asking if<br>
it's any better than the other solution. In other words, why libgpiod should<br>
be accepted to OE-Core, but not libsoc? Maybe it should be submitted to<br>
meta-openembedded layer instead?</div></blockquote></div><br>Agreed, the barrier for oe-core is high on purpose and I don't think this is general purpose enough. meta-oe is a perfect fit though.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ross</div></div>