<div dir="ltr">Can you send a v2 instead?<div><br></div><div>Presumably they don't already use CC_FOR_BUILD and so on?</div><div><br></div><div>Ross</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 August 2017 at 13:59, Alexander Kanavin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 08/07/2017 03:59 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+- $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $< -o $@<br>
++ $(Q)$(BUILD_CC) $(CFLAGS) $< -o $@<br>
<br>
<br>
This won't work when CFLAGS contains arguments that the host compiler doesn't recognise, or are inappropriate.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Right, should've been BUILD_CFLAGS? Can you amend the patch in-place?<br>
<br>
Alex<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>