<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Andrei Gherzan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrei@gherzan.ro" target="_blank">andrei@gherzan.ro</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><div><div class="m_-8137763220925518123gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Bruce Ashfield <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruce.ashfield@gmail.com" target="_blank">bruce.ashfield@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div></div></div></span><div class="gmail_quote"><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="m_-8137763220925518123gmail-h5">On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Andrei Gherzan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrei@gherzan.ro" target="_blank">andrei@gherzan.ro</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="m_-8137763220925518123gmail-m_1054286525283218213gmail-">On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Bruce Ashfield <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com" target="_blank">bruce.ashfield@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Already discussed with Khem and Richard in the original<br>
thread.<br>
<br>
I'm sending another patch shortly to back this off to a note/warning.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>That is nice but wouldn't that clutter the build logs for no reason? For people who don't take advantage of scc definitions that is. Could you point me to the initial discussion? Just want to understand and maybe vote to remove it altogether. </div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div></div><div>It's a yocto bug. We need to flag BSP definitions that aren't valid, otherwise the tools</div><div>will end up building things like qemuarm for someone that has a misconfigured BSP.</div><div><br></div><div>If you don't have a defconfig (as someone won't have if they are using a fully defined</div><div>BSP, but with the wrong name) and the wrong entry point, or no entry point, is returned</div><div>we have to flag it.</div><div><br></div><div>The actual bug is: 11878, and there's a related fallout of that bad definition.</div><div><br></div><div>So no, it won't be deleted, but I will make it check for a few more parameters before</div><div>erroring or logging.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. I'll keep an eye on the ml for the fix.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It'll arrive shortly, testing it now.</div><div><br></div><div>It shouldn't put anything in your logs during the build now, I'm just building the rpi3 to</div><div>confirm and re-testing a case that I want to fail :D</div><div><br></div><div>Bruce</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div><div>--</div><div>Andrei Gherzan</div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"</div>
</div></div>