<div dir="ltr">On 11 September 2017 at 22:58, Otavio Salvador <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 11 September 2017 at 22:33, California Sullivan<br>
> <<a href="mailto:california.l.sullivan@intel.com">california.l.sullivan@intel.<wbr>com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Bump initramfs-framework PR, as it was missed in the previous<br>
>> initramfs-framework patch.<br>
><br>
><br>
> There's no need to bump PR. In the ideal world, the PR isn't assigned at<br>
> all.<br>
<br>
</span>there is, the package moved across arches so adding the PR makes sure<br>
it is upgraded.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Surely the PR service handles this if you're running a feed. If you're not running a feed then this isn't a problem.</div><div><br></div><div>Ross </div></div></div></div>