<div dir="ltr">> <span style="font-size:12.8px">Changing arch on a package resets the incrementing PR? Isn't that a bug?</span><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Arch is part of the key in PR server database.</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">It's not a bug, because when you have MACHINE_ARCH recipe then it's normal that different MACHINEs (with different bbappends in BSP layers) have different EXTENDPRAUTO, without the arch in the key, the EXTENDPRAUTO would be incremented in PR server database every time you change MACHINE variable. It's not ideal but better than the alternative.</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Burton, Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class="">On 11 September 2017 at 23:01, Otavio Salvador <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">otavio.salvador@ossystems.<wbr>com.br</a>></span> wrote:<br></span><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 11 September 2017 at 22:58, Otavio Salvador<br>
> <<a href="mailto:otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">otavio.salvador@ossystems.com<wbr>.br</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>> > On 11 September 2017 at 22:33, California Sullivan<br>
>> > <<a href="mailto:california.l.sullivan@intel.com" target="_blank">california.l.sullivan@intel.c<wbr>om</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Bump initramfs-framework PR, as it was missed in the previous<br>
>> >> initramfs-framework patch.<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > There's no need to bump PR. In the ideal world, the PR isn't assigned<br>
>> > at<br>
>> > all.<br>
>><br>
>> there is, the package moved across arches so adding the PR makes sure<br>
>> it is upgraded.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Surely the PR service handles this if you're running a feed. If you're not<br>
> running a feed then this isn't a problem.<br>
<br>
</span>It does not; it goes back to r0.</blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Changing arch on a package resets the incrementing PR? Isn't that a bug?</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Ross </div></font></span></div></div></div>
<br>--<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">Openembedded-core@lists.<wbr>openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/openembedded-<wbr>core</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>