<div dir="ltr">On 17 October 2017 at 20:25, Khem Raj <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 14 October 2017 at 16:48, Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> ---<br>
>> .../libcheck/{<a href="http://libcheck_0.10.0.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">libcheck_0.10.0.<wbr>bb</a> => <a href="http://libcheck_git.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">libcheck_git.bb</a>} | 11<br>
>> ++++++-----<br>
><br>
><br>
> Why not 0.11.0?<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>I was getting printf format related security warnings. Latest built<br>
with clang/gcc and musl<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Not a massive fan of "random SHA", can we cherry-pick the patches?</div><div><br></div><div>Ross </div></div></div></div>