<div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 5:24 AM Alexander Kanavin <<a href="mailto:alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com">alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 11/02/2017 02:21 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Alexander Kanavin<br>
> <<a href="mailto:alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com" target="_blank">alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> On 11/02/2017 07:39 AM, Khem Raj wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Changes since v2: Move to 1.1.18 release<br>
>>> -PV = "1.1.16+git${SRCPV}"<br>
>>> +PV = "1.1.18+git${SRCPV}"<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Can you drop this, and simply rename the recipe to <a href="http://musl_1.1.18.bb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">musl_1.1.18.bb</a> please?<br>
><br>
> Why? keeping it on _git makes sense to me.<br>
</blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">We always use a given srcrev always this time</div><div dir="auto">It just happens to match with release </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Only if it's a random development revision (e.g. 1.1.18 plus a bunch of<br>
commits) - if the version taken is a pristine tagged release, it should<br>
be indicated as such, regardless of whether it's taken from a tarball or<br>
a git checkout.<br>
<br>
Alex<br>
</blockquote></div></div>