<div dir="ltr">On 18 January 2018 at 16:47, Randy MacLeod <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:randy.macleod@windriver.com" target="_blank">randy.macleod@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 2018-01-11 11:18 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:<span class=""><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 9 January 2018 at 01:40, Chen Qi <<a href="mailto:Qi.Chen@windriver.com" target="_blank">Qi.Chen@windriver.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qi.Chen@windriver.com" target="_blank">Qi.Chen@windriver.com</a>><wbr>> wrote:<br>
<br>
* hostname is explicitly enabled to keep the same with previous recipe's<br>
behaviour.<br>
<br>
<br>
But buildhistory-diff:<br>
<br>
packages/corei7-64-poky-linux/<wbr>coreutils/coreutils: FILELIST: added "/usr/bin/hostname"<br>
<br>
So the old coreutils wasn't building hostname at all (we use /bin/hostname from busybox).<br>
</blockquote>
</span></blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Are you asking Chen to package coreutils.hostname and<br>
use the alternatives mechanism with busybox's hostname as the default?<br>
(busybox hostname has annoyed me in a past life!)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm not sure what I'm asking, just pointing out that the log is wrong as the old coreutils wasn't building a hostname binary.</div><div><br></div><div>If someone sets base_bindir and bindir to the same directory then there will be a conflict, so this does need to be sorted somehow.</div><div><br></div><div>Ross </div></div></div></div>