<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 Feb 2018 20:32, "Christopher Larson" <<a href="mailto:kergoth@gmail.com">kergoth@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="quoted-text">On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:50 AM, André Draszik <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:git@andred.net" target="_blank">git@andred.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">From: André Draszik <<a href="mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com" target="_blank">andre.draszik@jci.com</a>><br>
<br>[...]<br>
Also, this now is very similar to oe_runmake().<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>If it’s similar to oe_runmake, why the long overly verbose function name for the new function? Is oe_runcmake not viable?</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I was contemplating that, but in the end thought no as I'd personally find it confusing. This is not running cmake, in that cmake alone generates the build system files (make files, ninja build, msvc solutions, etc). It is running cmake --build to execute the actual build (make, ninja, etc), hence the name.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I'm open for other thoughts...</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">A.</div></div>