<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:denis@denix.org" target="_blank">denis@denix.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:37:44PM -0800, akuster808 wrote:<br></span><span class="">> I think openembededd-core is incorrect. it should have been<br>
> meta-openbedded-core or meta-core.<br>
<br>
</span>It does have a layer called just "meta" though...<span class=""><br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>In retrospect, using the word "meta" everywhere becomes useless. No layer contains actual sources and never should, so they're all "meta" data, it's redundant to have to say so in every layer's name (etc).<br><br></div><div>It would have been better to use that space to convey something meaningful, such as: "whether a layer was designed to be a bsp, a distro, something else, or a combination", or perhaps other meaningful information.<br></div></div><br></div></div>