<div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:09 PM Andre McCurdy <<a href="mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com">armccurdy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> We'll hopefully be firing the 2.5 RC build on Monday, so I did a build<br>
> today to see where we stand. As is typical we got two new failures on<br>
> the autobuilder... My test build included the pseudo bump which<br>
> caused an almost complete rebuild, which is a great way to shake out<br>
> intermittent failures.<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12704" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12704</a><br>
> Go appears to be using the target CFLAGS when using the host compiler,<br>
> with predictable failures when the host is old and doesn't support new<br>
> flags.<br>
<br>
Maybe worth resurrecting something like:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-February/118212.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-February/118212.html</a><br>
<br>
to flush out similar issues?</blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The issue at hand is a bit different where portions</div><div dir="auto">Are built using native compiler in target recipe itself simple fix would be to pass right c flags </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">This patch in itself does have merits and we could consider this for 2.6 it would be intrusive but would result in cleanup</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
> <a href="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705</a><br>
> u-boot build failure<br>
><br>
> CC'ing the usual maintainers of those two recipes, if you get a moment<br>
> to look at these then that would be much appreciated.<br>
><br>
> I'll also say that if you have any outstanding patches that *need* to<br>
> be in 2.5 and can't wait for 2.5.1 then say so now, or forever hold<br>
> your peace (and submit them for master/backport to 2.5.1).<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Ross<br>
> --<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" target="_blank">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br>
-- <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" target="_blank">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>