<div dir="ltr">Any update on this one? Or should we downgrade it on our side when bumping oe-core/thud revision?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 7:48 PM Martin Jansa <<a href="mailto:martin.jansa@gmail.com">martin.jansa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:45:08AM -0700, akuster808 wrote:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> On 3/24/19 11:01 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:<br>
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 07:52:06AM +0000, <a href="mailto:Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de" target="_blank">Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de</a> wrote:<br>
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:<br>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:45 PM Armin Kuster <<a href="mailto:akuster808@gmail.com" target="_blank">akuster808@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> >>>> This reverts commit a384248938ea9db096866bf4ec8678d35ca62a12.<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> This package update slipped in doing the maint process. Removing it.<br>
> >> <snip><br>
> >>> Just my opinion - don't consider this as NAK.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> * I already fixed the recipes that failed for me. For at least one the<br>
> >>> change is no more compatible to 1.68.0.<br>
> >>> * This makes PV going backwards<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Thanks for addressing - what do others think?<br>
> >> I'm not using thud yet, but updating boost in stable branch would break<br>
> >> too many things and I would have to revert that change in our trees. Some boost<br>
> >> updates are in the end quite trivial and just require recompiling<br>
> >> everything but still, I would prefer that boost is not updated in stable<br>
> >> branches unless there is a huge security/stability issue with the old version.<br>
> > Agreed.<br>
> ><br>
> > I care less for PV going backwards nowadays, it's probably less annoying than<br>
> > bumping PE first in master and then backporting PE bump to thud.<br>
> ><br>
> > People with build issues related to boost upgrade probably never<br>
> > built whole image to push it as an upgrade to end devices.<br>
> <br>
> So do you agree with the revert?<br>
<br>
I do.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: <a href="mailto:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com" target="_blank">Martin.Jansa@gmail.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div>