<div><div dir="auto">Sounds good then unless someone else has more</div></div><div dir="auto">Info </div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:07 AM Alexander Kanavin <<a href="mailto:alex.kanavin@gmail.com">alex.kanavin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Note that the 32 bit machine from meta-intel has actually been using<br>
core2-32 tune for a while, so we are simply catching up here.<br>
<br>
Alex<br>
<br>
On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 18:02, Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:00 AM Burton, Ross <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com" target="_blank">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 08:55, Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > While I like this change I also worry if we are leaving out any significant x86 implementation out there in embedded space x86-64 is relatively newer compared to 32 bit which was long stable<br>
>><br>
>> core2duo isn't exactly a modern chipset though, first released in<br>
>> 2006. Does anyone *know* of any significant 32-bit x86 deployments<br>
>> which are using significantly older hardware?<br>
><br>
><br>
> If intel bsp folks are okay with this then let’s go for it<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Ross<br>
</blockquote></div></div>